How much overtime is too much?

October 9, 2009 by lcauditor

No one has answered the original question.

How much overtime per week is too much? Is it 10 hours, 20, 30, or 40 hours? Nine county employees have worked more than 250 hours of overtime in the first 13 weeks of the fiscal year. On average that’s 19.23 hours per week. The “winner” worked 568 regular hours and 546.5 overtime hours, which is an average of 85.73 hours per week.

Which is best practice: Use existing employees and consistently work overtime to fill staffing needs OR have enough employees on-hand and occasionally have them work overtime?

Based upon the data collected by Adam Belz of The Gazette (see above link), it appears using existing employees and working consistent overtime is the best financial solution. If that’s the case, should it be adopted county-wide? If not, why not?

The forty-hour work week was adopted many decades ago for a variety of reasons. Are we ready to say that the 40 hour work week should apply to everyone except those in public safety? What is our responsibility as an employer?

Work the plan and communicate, communicate, communicate

October 5, 2009 by lcauditor

A few weeks ago, Greg Eyerly, the Cedar Rapids Flood Recovery Director, gave a speech to the Downtown Rotary.  My take away from his speech was “work the plan”.  

My intent is to follow the County’s published policies, procedures, and plans.  And why wouldn’t I follow them?  I know I’m an autonomous elected official and I have some latitude to do what I want when I want.  

But does being autonomous give me the right to disregard what’s in the best interests of Linn County – to disregard “the plan”?  Does it give me the right to ignore the policies that have been in effect before I was elected?  

Wasn’t I elected to do what’s in the best interests of the County?  And shouldn’t that override my desire to be autonomous – or to get re-elected – or to win favor with my political party – or to be popular – or to maintain the status quo? 

From time to time, I receive feedback that I’m posting too much information on www.linncountyauditor.org , on this blog, in my tweets, and in emails. Why post information that I’m not required to post?  Is it a part of “the plan”? 

Take a look at Linn County’s Mission Statement.  It says, “It is the mission of the Linn County Government to provide all residents the most efficient and responsive public services, while maintaining sound fiscal management in order to enhance the quality of life in Linn County”.  Isn’t it efficient to anticipate what residents might want to see and post it on the web before they ask?  How do residents know we are practicing sound fiscal management if they cannot see how we are spending taxpayer dollars? 

Along the same lines, the Board of Supervisors has adopted Strategic Goals and Initiatives.  I’ve actually read them and I try to incorporate them into the day-to-day operations of the Auditor’s Office.  

The County’s first strategy is:  Excel in customer satisfaction.  Three of the goals included in this strategy are (B) maintain regular communications with the public, (C) solicit feedback from customers, and (D) establish accountability for customer satisfaction.  

The County’s second strategy is:  Achieve effective communications.  One of the goals included in this strategy is to (D) educate the public by providing information about who we are and what we do. 

The County has plans that have withstood the test of time.  I am going to continue to “work the plans”.  I am going to continue to be autonomous.  I am going to continue to do what’s in the best interests of Linn County – first.  And I am going to continue to communicate, communicate, communicate who we are and what we do until the Vision of the Office of Auditor is realized (Every person engaged in local government) or the public can tell me the difference between the City and the County.

Staff embracing Twitter too

September 15, 2009 by lcauditor

I was minding my own business (actually your business) one day when John Q. Public called me up and asked me what I was doing for him today?  I told him, but he was still confused as to whether I worked for the City or the County.  I tried to explain, but he just couldn’t get it straight.

So I told John Q that I was going to post what I was doing every day on Twitter.  He knew about Twitter and he had a cell phone and he said he’d follow my updates every day because he really wanted to know what I was doing.  And he promised that someday, he’d figure out the difference between the City and the County. 

Look to the right –> and you will see my most recent tweet and the most recent tweets from members of my staff.  Maybe it will help you appreciate what we do.  Maybe it will help you understand that we take transparency in government very seriously in the Auditor’s Office.  Maybe it will help someone understand the difference between the City and the County.

Linn County convicts 10 of election misconduct

September 5, 2009 by lcauditor

From time to time, especially just before an election, we receive inquiries on what happens to voters who might take advantage of Iowa’s election day registration laws. For example, the thought is that a voter might go to one precinct and vote and then go to another precinct and vote a second ballot. Or they request an absentee ballot be sent to their home in Texas – mark the ballot and mail it back to us – and then show up at another precinct on election day and via election day registration laws vote a second ballot. I’m unaware of anyone in Linn County voting two ballots for the same election.

After the November 2008 election, some voters were charged with election misconduct because they voted when they should not have voted, e.g., they lost their right to vote and it had not been restored at the time they voted.

I searched Iowa Courts Online and found ten convictions for election misconduct:

06571 FECR081426
06571 FECR081524
06571 FECR082300
06571 FECR082294
06571 FECR081306
06571 FECR081309
06571 FECR081310
06571 FECR081313
06571 FECR081312
06571 FECR081397

And three cases pending action:

06571 FECR081398
06571 FECR081305
06571 FECR081308

I’m hoping the publicity, if any, of the convictions will discourage people from voting when they should NOT be voting.

And I’m hoping those that have the right to vote will take the time to become educated on the candidates/issues and that they will then exercise their right to vote.

The next election is on Tuesday, September 8th. The polls in Linn County are open from Noon to 8pm. Please make voting a priority in your life.

Wages: Schools versus the County

September 1, 2009 by lcauditor

Once a year, local governments are required to publish the names of their employees and the salaries paid those employees. Sometimes those salaries get some attention, e.g., the total compensation of former CR Schools Superintendent David Markward and other superintendents caught the attention of The Gazette.

But most of the time, schools salaries go unnoticed and I’m unsure why. I view it as a double standard, i.e., there’s one standard for local elected officials, another for city and county employees, and another for school employees. Yet, they all receive funding from property taxes. 

About a month ago, I started asking for and receiving wage and salary information from the major school districts located in Linn County.  I’ve been waiting for The Gazette to gather the data for two years and post it on their Area Governments Salaries Database, but they’ve had a few other priorities.  And gathering the data was not quite as easy as I envisioned as some school districts complained that they had to do extra work to create reports.

I plan to provide the data to the Linn County Compensation Board in January 2010.  And I plan to use the salary information to determine if my employees are being paid a competitive wage to perform the same work as their peers in the schools.

I realize that some people may look at this list and want to take cheap shots at some individuals and positions.  I’m looking at it from the perspective of should a custodian at the county be paid the same as a custodian in the schools and in the cities?  Should a supervisor who supervises 10-15 personnel in a school be paid the same as a supervisor who supervises 10-15 personnel in the county and city?  Is an elected official who manages 50 personnel in the county paid the same as a non-elected manager managing the same number of personnel in the schools or in the city?

For whatever reasons, there are huge variations in pay for similar positions within local governments.  I guess that’s what you get when you have “local control”.  But if the responsibilities are the same, what are the reasons for the variations in pay?  Should the variations be large or small?  And since property taxpayers provide most of the funding for local governments, should there be a universal pay scale for local government employees in Linn County?

The links below will take you to the wage information for schools and the County for FY2008/2009.  I would be interested in your feedback.

 

P.S.  School board elections are one week from today, i.e., Tuesday, September 8th.  The polls open at Noon in Linn County and close at 8pm.

Education is important to Iowans.  Who we hire as employees, how many employees we hire, and how much we pay them are important.  Who we elect to school boards should be equally important. 

Please take the time to become familiar with the candidates and vote.  And then urge your friends and family to do the same.

Request for Input on the AOB and me

July 23, 2009 by lcauditor

I’m collecting input on the Administrative Office Building (AOB) and my performance.  If I tell you why I’m asking for input on the AOB, I may prejudice your answer. 

As for the input on me, I stole this question from former Mayor Ed Koch of New York City.  He was famous for asking the public:  How am I doing?  

When was the last time a public servant – let alone an elected official asked you:  How am I doing?

How am I doing as your County Auditor? (1 is the worst and 5 is the best)(answers) 

Do you believe Linn County’s Administrative Office Building will be damaged again by flood waters before flood protection is installed?(answers)

Is reoccupying Linn County’s Administrative Office Building important to revitalizing the Downtown?(online surveys)

P.S.  I would like to see at least 100 votes in each poll.  Please forward these polls to your friends.

No cost benefit analysis

July 21, 2009 by lcauditor

On July 5th, The Gazette wrote a story about my request for information from the Linn County Disaster Recovery Committee.  You may have concluded from that story that I had received all of the information from the Committee at the time the story was written, but that was not the case.  

At this time, I have supposedly received all of the information; yet, I cannot find a cost benefit analysis within the information I have received – which is one of the main reasons I requested the information.  I wanted to compare the life cycle costs of owning Westdale Mall versus owning Steve & Barry’s (Linn County West) versus owning the Administrative Office Building (AOB).  

I cannot find the cost benefit analysis because it does not exist – it has never existed.  And today, a member of the Recovery Committee confirmed it has never existed.  That really wasn’t news to me because I had suspected all along that there never was a cost benefit analysis. 

So let’s stop calling the decision to remodel and move back into the AOB a business decision because it’s not and never was a business decision – it’s a political decision. 

And political decisions do not have to be based on real numbers or any numbers.  

They are based on who is the incumbent office holder and who has the authority to make the decision.  In this case, three or more members of the Board of Supervisors get to make the decision.

And the next time someone – anyone says, “a new roof would cost this or repaving the parking lot would cost that or the air conditioning would have to be replaced”, ask them to show you a quote from a roofer or a road paver or an air conditioning firm.  If they’re referring to Westdale Mall or Steve & Barry’s, chances are they don’t have a quote and they have never seen a bonafide quote. 

Here’s the information I was provided by the Recovery Committee.  Let me know if you see anything resembling a cost benefit analysis.

Meeting Notes

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/12-02-08-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/12-09-08-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/12-16-08-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/12-23-08-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/01-06-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/01-13-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/01-20-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/01-27-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/02-02-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/02-10-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/02-17-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/03-24-09-disaster-recovery-meeting-notes.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/meeting-notes-closed-past.pdf

 

Buildings

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/administrative-office-building.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/courthouse-juvenile-courts.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/freeway.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/lccs.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/linn-county-west.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/options.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/sheriffs-office.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/sheriffs-office-correctional-center.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/witwer.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/youth-shelter.doc

 

Miscellaneous

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/adjusters-international.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/correspondence.pdf

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/grants.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/handouts-1.pdf

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/handouts-2.pdf

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/handouts-3.pdf

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/insurance.doc

http://lcauditor.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/miscellaneous-items.doc

Where would I pay the lowest and highest property taxes?

July 14, 2009 by lcauditor

I posed that question to John A. Adams – Property Tax Manager for the Office of Auditor.  For the purposes of this exercise, I asked John to assume the residence was assessed at $300K.    Now I know several media sources like to quote taxes based upon $100K assessments, but even the newest homes being offered as affordable housing seem to have a starting price of around $180K. 

When I look at the highs and lows illustrated in this table, I wonder if taxpayers are really cognizant of where their property taxes go and how much they are paying?  If you had to write out a check every six months for $1500 to $3000 would you be more aware of the amount of property taxes you are paying versus including it in your monthly mortgage payments. 

The table below does illustrate that where you live is important when it comes to how much you will pay in property taxes.  You might want to pay attention to those taxes the next time you buy or build a home.   

For additional information on property taxes, go to Property Tax Services.

Lowest in a City            
In which City and School District?            
Property Location 2009-2010 Levy Property Taxes with no Rollback Residential Taxes on $300,000 $300,000 House with Homestead House with Homestead  & Veterans  
City/School Rates and no Credits House Credit Only Exemption  
Bertram City/Cedar Rapids School 25.43227 7,630 3,478 3,388 3,341  
Bertram City/Mt. Vernon School 29.02462 8,707 3,970 3,867 3,813  
Robins City/Cedar Rapids School 30.60584 9,182 4,186 4,078 4,021  
             
             
Highest in a City            
In which City and School District?            
Property Location 2009-2010 Levy Property Taxes with no Rollback Residential Taxes on $300,000 $300,000 House with Homestead House with Homestead  & Veterans  
City//School Rates and no Credits House Credit Only Exemption  
Center Point City/Center Point School 40.18171 12,055 5,496 5,353 5,279  
Marion City/Linn Mar School 41.50177 12,451 5,676 5,529 5,452  
Cedar Rapids City/Linn Mar School 42.62398 12,787 5,830 5,679 5,600  
             
             
Lowest in a Township (Rural Area)            
In which Township and School District?            
Property Location 2009-2010 Levy Property Taxes with no Rollback Residential Taxes on $300,000 $300,000 House with Homestead House with Homestead  & Veterans  
Township/School/Fire Dist. Rates and no Credits House Credit Only Exemption  
Boulder Township/Monticello School/Fire 4 23.77930 7,134 3,252 3,168 3,124  
Marion Township/Cedar Rapids School 25.51470 7,654 3,490 3,399 3,352  
Clinton Township/Cedar Rapids School/Fire 6 25.60043 7,680 3,501 3,411 3,363  
             
             
Highest in a Township (Rural Area)            
In which Township and School District?            
Property Location 2009-2010 Levy Property Taxes with no Rollback Residential Taxes on $300,000 $300,000 House with Homestead House with Homestead  & Veterans  
Township/School/Fire Dist. Rates and no Credits House Credit Only Exemption  
Maine Township/Linn Mar School 31.18937 9,357 4,266 4,155 4,098  
Marion Township/Linn Mar School 31.82605 9,548 4,353 4,240 4,181  
Linn Township/Linn Mar School 32.07528 9,623 4,387 4,273 4,214  
             

How do we stop losing our young?

July 14, 2009 by lcauditor

About three weeks ago, my wife and I moved our youngest son to Denver.   I posted the following on Twitter:  “Moved son to Denver.  Average age in Iowa just incrd. I’m 0 for 3 for kids in IA.   How do we stop losing our young?”

I received one reply on Twitter and several on Facebook.  Let me know which ones you agree with or disagree with and/or add your own opinion.

RT at 2:15pm June 27
Joel, I think limiting the role of government is a good start. We have 3 kids and we are not quite at that age yet, but the Business Climate and Public Policy in our community and State do have a direct relationship… imo. We need sustainability….

TH at 2:45pm June 27
The first step is to repeal Iowa’s so-called “Right-to-work” law. This will raise wages and benefits for all workers in every sector. Raising wages for workers is, imo, the single most important thing we can do to keep young folks in Iowa.

SS at 2:53pm June 27
Keep the Younger college degree kids in Iowa by giving assistance to college student loans for those that went to college in Iowa and want to stay and work in Iowa, and not move the jobs to lower wage places like India or China. How about making Iowan’s come first!

DG at 3:42pm June 27
Joel, The state of Iowa does nothing for anyone except farmers. You have to look at our senators and representatives that are all farmers. The only good thing the state has is the schools.

AW at 4:23pm June 27
Younger people feel as though they are not part of the decision making process on the state and local government level. They feel disinfranchised by the fact that their voices, ideas and methods are not listened to and applied by the powers that be.
 

As an example, since the flood, I have wanted to see our communities use the minds of the students from the three state universities to work along city, county and state government to assist in recovery and rebuilding efforts. Not only are we using the brainpower of some of the brightest minds in our state, these students will feel like they are a part of something and may want to settle here. Also this is a way of the governmental bodies to pick through whom their next civil servants and employees will be.
 
noyzsource @lcauditor You can’t stop losing them. You encourage them to see new things and sometimes they’ll see what they left behind and come back.  5:56 PM Jun 27th 

CP at 6:27pm June 27
Being an Iowa native who has moved away within the last week I have some ideas as to why myself others are fleeing. First, many Iowans stay in the state to go to school, high out of state tuition in neighboring states give kids the opportunity to stay close. With the quality education that we receive here it gives us the opportunity start a profession almost anywhere we like. By the time we reach graduation we are ready to explore, taking our education with us. Second, I’ve heard Iowa defined as a place to retire, or “you’ll be back to raise your children”, never have I heard “its a great place to be really active” or “your going to have so much fun there” (I do love Iowa, and yes, there are opportunities for recreational activities) but not as many as other places. Who knows maybe when I realize really how great Iowa is, I’ll be back to raise my kids.

AM at 2:58pm June 28
I’m going to have to agree with Chris on this one. Luckily us Iowans are educated so well that it allows us to branch out and explore new opportunities throughout the world. Thanks for helping move me out though.

Who’s running for CR Mayor and Council?

June 17, 2009 by lcauditor

Frequently, my office receives requests for information on who has taken out papers to run for Cedar Rapids mayor and city council.  Four to eight years ago, the list of names we maintained in our office might have been a good indicator of who was running.  

Now, people interested in running can obtain all of the forms and information they need on our web site or from the Secretary of State.  We don’t have any visibility into who is downloading forms nor do we want any visibility.  For example, Ron Corbett, the only candidate to officially announce he’s running for mayor, does not appear to have obtained a candidate packet from the CR City Clerk or the Linn County Elections Office. 

City candidates cannot file their nomination papers with their respective city clerks until August 24th; however, to get on the ballot, they must file no later than September 17th.  I would hope that candidates are gathering signatures on their petitions now, but that’s a choice they get to make. 

Here are the names of some potential candidates in the City of Cedar Rapids based upon requests for candidate information from the City or the Linn County Elections Office: 

Office

Last Name

First Name

Address

E-mail

         
*CR Mayor Allard Jeff 1439 Wolf DR NW  
*CR At-Large Busch Calvin 1434 C St SW # 3 calpina@hotmail.com
*CR At-Large Duffy Nick 122 12th ST NW  
CR D3 McGrane Jerry    
CR Mayor Olinger Nick 1620 4th Ave SE johngsaceys@aol.com
CR Mayor Schloss Daniel 1500 Bever Ave SE daniel_cassandra@q.com
CR D3 Stevens JD 1107 38TH ST SE jdsdesigns@hotmail.com

 * Source = CR City Clerk 

Note:  The names of some potential candidates are not included in the preceding list due to their request that their name not be released.  Their request is being honored as specified in the Code of Iowa – Chapter 22 – section 7 – paragraph 18.